Taco Tires

General Grabber A/TX vs BFGoodrich KO2 on a Tacoma

Tire comparison8 min readUpdated 2026-08-16

By the Taco Tires editor

Short answer

The General Grabber A/TX is the closest thing to a cheaper KO2 in this dataset: five axes tie outright, including snow, wet, road comfort, mud, and efficiency. The BFGoodrich KO2 wins trail, durability, tread life, and looks by a point each for a blended 7.9 against 7.6; the General wins value from the same budget tier.

Grabber A/TX vs KO2: how close is the cheaper option?

The BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2 is the tire most Tacoma all-terrain shopping starts with - fourth of eighteen all-terrains in this dataset and sixth of fifty overall. The General Grabber A/TX is the model people most often ask about as a way of not paying for it, eighth of eighteen and twelfth overall. Both are severe-snow rated, both sit in the same medium budget tier, both come in nine of the same Tacoma sizes, and half the score matrix comes out level. This is the substitution question in its purest form: what exactly does the extra money buy?

Score axis (0-10)General Grabber A/TXBFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2Edge
Road comfort77Tie
Wet grip77Tie
Snow88Tie
Trail89KO2 by 1
Mud66Tie
Durability89KO2 by 1
Tread life78KO2 by 1
Efficiency55Tie
Looks78KO2 by 1
Value87General by 1
Blended score7.67.9KO2 by 0.3
Both all-terrains on the ten scored axes from the Tacoma tire research dataset, higher being better. Five rows tie. The blended figure averages seven of the ten axes and excludes mud, looks, and efficiency.

How to read a one-point gap

These axes are an editorial synthesis of published manufacturer specifications, tire-industry write-ups, retailer fitment data, and Tacoma-owner reports across the 83 documents this dataset cites. Taco Tires does not test tires, so one point signals which way the published record leans, not a measured difference. Four one-point gaps in the same direction is a stronger signal than any one of them alone. See How we score tires on the about page.

The five axes that tie

Road comfort 7, wet grip 7, snow 8, mud 6, efficiency 5 - identical. Those five cover a Tacoma's normal week completely. Both tires carry the 3-Peak Mountain Snowflake severe-snow rating and score the same 8 on snow, so both are accepted where winter tires are legally required and neither has a winter advantage. Both are heavy enough to sit at a 5 for efficiency, and both are noticeably louder than a mild all-terrain at a 7 for comfort.

That is the finding most people are actually looking for when they ask whether the General is a real alternative. On rain, on snow, on noise, on fuel, and on mud, our synthesis cannot separate them. The extra money the KO2 costs is not buying any of those - it is buying four specific things, and whether they are worth it depends entirely on how you use the truck.

Where the BFGoodrich KO2 wins

Trail 9 against 8 and durability 9 against 8 are the two that matter, and they are the same two the KO2 built its reputation on. A 9 on durability is the top mark any all-terrain in this dataset reaches, shared only with its KO3 successor, and it describes the reinforced sidewall and cut-resistant shoulder that made the tire an overlanding default. If your Tacoma airs down over sharp rock, drags sidewalls on ledges, or runs shale-strewn forest roads, that is a real and specific advantage.

  • Trail 9 and durability 9: the highest off-road marks in the all-terrain group, and the KO2's core argument.
  • Tread life 8 against 7: a point of extra mileage, which partly repays the price difference over the life of the set.
  • Looks 8 against 7: the KO2's sidewall is the more recognisable of the two under a Tacoma.
  • Its dataset tag for proven Tacoma fitment is worth something practical - it is one of the most widely documented tires on this truck.

There is one caution attached to the KO2 that has nothing to do with the General. The dataset flags it for buyers who want the latest successor, because BFGoodrich has replaced it with the KO3, which scores a point higher on both wet grip and snow. If you are paying a premium for the BFGoodrich name and construction, it is worth checking whether the KO3 is available in your size at a similar price before settling on the older tire.

Where the General Grabber A/TX wins

Value 8 against 7 is the General's only scored win, and the important detail is that both tires sit in the same medium budget tier. That means the value edge is not the dataset saying the General is cheap - it is the dataset saying the General delivers more per dollar within the same price band. Its own tags are snow, value, trail, and durability, which is a fair summary of a tire that scores 8 on three of those four.

Look at what the General gives up in exchange: one point of trail, one of durability, one of tread life, one of appearance. For a Tacoma that drives dirt and gravel roads, tows a trailer, and sees the occasional rutted trail, none of those four is likely to be the difference between getting somewhere and not. The two axes where a shortfall would actually strand you - snow at 8 and mud at 6 - are tied.

The gap widens exactly where you air down

Trail and durability are the axes that separate these two, and they are the axes that matter when tire pressure is low and the rocks are sharp. A Tacoma that stays on graded surfaces will likely never find the difference. A Tacoma that spends weekends on rock will find it in one trip. Be honest about which truck you own before deciding the extra point is not worth paying for.

Tacoma sizes: nine shared, one each

Nine sizes appear on both lists, across 16, 17, and 18 inch wheels: 265/75R16, 285/75R16, 265/70R17, 275/70R17, 285/70R17, 255/80R17, 315/70R17, 265/70R18, and 275/70R18. That includes the standard Tacoma 33-inch metric fitment and the narrow-33 alternative, so almost any build can be specified in either tire.

One exclusive each. The General adds 285/70R18, a 33-inch fitment for 18-inch wheels - which is a meaningful gap in the KO2's catalog if your Tacoma came on 18s and you would rather not buy new wheels. The KO2 adds 285/75R17, the taller 34-inch 17-inch size. Both are worth checking against your generation and lift before you let the score matrix decide.

Both give up quiet, and both give up weight

The General's dataset cautions are quietest highway and lowest weight, and its scores of 7 for comfort and 5 for efficiency say the same thing about the KO2. These are heavy LT-construction all-terrains. Match or exceed the factory load index to keep the truck's rated payload, and set inflation from a load table rather than the door placard.

The verdict for a Tacoma

A 0.3 blended gap between two same-tier tires that tie on five axes is a narrow win, and the honest reading is that the General Grabber A/TX is a legitimate substitute for the KO2 rather than a compromise. The premium buys trail bite, casing toughness, a point of mileage, and a more recognisable sidewall. If those four matter to your truck, pay it. If they do not, the General delivers the same snow, wet, comfort, mud, and efficiency for less.

  • Buy the BFGoodrich KO2 if you air down over rock, if maximum sidewall toughness is the point, or if you want the longest-documented Tacoma fitment record of the two.
  • Buy the General Grabber A/TX if your off-road use is dirt, gravel, and moderate trail - value 8 from the same budget tier, with snow, wet, comfort, mud, and efficiency all tied.
  • Buy the Grabber A/TX also if your Tacoma runs 18-inch wheels and you want a 33: 285/70R18 is on its list and not on the KO2's.
  • Before buying a KO2 at full price, check the KO3 - the successor scores a point higher on both wet grip and snow, and the dataset flags the KO2 for buyers who want the latest version.

Frequently asked questions

Keep going

Sources

Compare your exact sizes

Run any size in this guide through the Tacoma tire calculator to see diameter, width, speedometer error, effective gearing, and highway RPM before you buy.